Divide Amicably logo mark
DivideAmicably Better outcomes. Less conflict. A fair future.
AI-assisted mediation, built around a real case workflow
Divide Amicably wordmark

Not every divorce needs to become a fight.

Divide Amicably is being built for couples who want a calmer, more transactional path through separation. The platform starts with separate intake, organizes financial facts and documents, surfaces disagreements, and builds a neutral working file before settlement options are proposed.

The goal is not to push either side harder. The goal is to remove avoidable confusion, reduce escalation, and give both parties a fairer starting point than positional court-first conflict.

Separate intake first Each spouse can tell their side privately before the case moves into shared issue work.
Facts before proposals Assets, debts, documents, and disputed items are reconciled before a neutral split is suggested.
Neutral baseline The recommendation engine is designed around stated facts, disclosed evidence, and general jurisdiction rules for guidance, not legal determinations.
How it works

The workflow follows how a real mediator would open, sort, and move a file.

1. Separate orientation and intake

Each person can describe goals, pressure points, facts, and concerns privately before the shared case file is shaped.

2. Disclosure and document gathering

Assets, debts, income records, and supporting documents are collected so the working file rests on something concrete.

3. Reconciliation of disagreements

If the parties declare different assets, values, or classifications, the conflict stays visible until it is narrowed or escalated.

4. Neutral scenario building

The platform can suggest a non-biased starting point based on the disclosed record and the likely legal baseline for the jurisdiction.

Pricing

Structured to land around 5% to 10% of a lawyer-attended mediation path, not the full cost of adversarial divorce work.

Lower-conflict cases Essential Split
$595 per couple

Best for couples who want a calm, structured file with separate intake, shared financial inventory, document intake, and a neutral first-pass framework before lawyers or courts increase cost.

  • separate intake for both spouses
  • shared asset and debt worksheet
  • neutral starting point for an amicable split
  • AI-generated neutral summary and gap analysis included
Higher-document or higher-asset cases Complex Estate
$1,495 per couple

For files with more financial categories, more supporting records, or more categories of disagreement that still belong in a neutral mediation workflow instead of immediate court escalation.

  • expanded financial and evidence workload
  • room for more narrative facts and supporting documents
  • still far below a lawyer-heavy mediation track
  • larger AI analysis budget for higher-document files
Traditional divorce mediation with lawyers involved can quickly move into the high four figures or more per couple. Divide Amicably is priced to stay far below that because it is neutral mediation support, not legal representation, not a law firm, and not a court process. Pricing is built to absorb normal AI analysis cost, secure storage, and workflow overhead while remaining well below a traditional lawyer-attended path.
Sign up

Reserve access now.

Choose a plan and create your account to start a mediation file.
Create an account to begin intake, upload records, and work through the neutral mediation workflow.
Notice at collection: account details, case inputs, uploaded documents, usage records, and AI-analysis inputs are collected and processed to operate, secure, and support the mediation workflow.
With or without lawyers

Couples can use Divide Amicably with or without separate lawyers. If lawyers are involved, they remain outside the platform as independent reviewers or advisors. The platform itself stays neutral, does not represent either side, and does not turn this into a legal proceeding by itself.

What the AI uses

The recommendation engine is meant to look at the full record, not one spouse's story.

  • Declared assets and debts from both parties

    The file combines both sides' inventories so one spouse cannot silently define the pool alone.

  • Existence, value, and classification of each item

    The system records whether each item exists, what each side says it is worth, and whether it is claimed as marital, separate, mixed, or disputed.

  • Supporting documents and narrative context

    Statements, uploaded records, and comments stay attached to the item so disagreements can be traced and reviewed.

  • Issue map beyond property alone

    Parenting, support, housing, debt, and process concerns are also part of the mediation file when they affect the path to agreement.

  • Jurisdiction baseline

    The platform is being built to compare the disclosed record against how the pilot jurisdiction would likely approach division, while keeping that model explicit and reviewable.

When facts differ

If the parties list different assets, the file is not treated as settled.

  • Unilateral items stay visible

    If only one spouse lists an asset or debt, it remains in the record as unresolved instead of disappearing.

  • Disputed values stay disputed

    If the parties disagree on valuation, the system records both positions and keeps the item out of the fully confirmed pool.

  • Completeness must be attested

    Both spouses eventually need to attest that the disclosed list is complete before the platform treats the asset pool as ready for a neutral recommendation.

  • Recommendations are baseline scenarios

    The system can suggest a fair starting point from the confirmed record, but unresolved conflicts still require more evidence, negotiation, or human review.

Boundaries

Non-biased mediation support, not legal representation.

  • No legal services

    Divide Amicably is not a law firm and does not provide legal representation to either party.

  • No legal proceeding on this platform

    Using this product does not start a court action, arbitration, or legally binding process by itself.

  • Neutral process design

    The product is being built to organize facts, show disagreements clearly, and create a fairer negotiation starting point for amicable parties.

  • Escalation where needed

    Unsafe, coercive, or unusually complex matters should move to human review instead of staying self-serve.

  • Independent review still matters

    Any final agreement should be reviewed, formalized, and filed through the proper legal channels if the parties choose to make it binding.

Current production shape

The pilot already has a real backend spine.

  • Live persistence

    Users, sessions, cases, invitations, issues, documents, review data, and billing records are stored in PostgreSQL on the production host.

  • Workflow already running

    The API supports intake, financial inventory, financial disclosure attestation, issue mapping, document intake, and neutral distribution scenarios.

  • Pilot direction

    The product is being shaped for a narrow, reviewer-aware pilot instead of a reckless mass-market legal automation launch.