Not every divorce needs to become a fight.
Divide Amicably is being built for couples who want a calmer, more transactional path through separation. The platform starts with separate intake, organizes financial facts and documents, surfaces disagreements, and builds a neutral working file before settlement options are proposed.
The goal is not to push either side harder. The goal is to remove avoidable confusion, reduce escalation, and give both parties a fairer starting point than positional court-first conflict.
The workflow follows how a real mediator would open, sort, and move a file.
Each person can describe goals, pressure points, facts, and concerns privately before the shared case file is shaped.
Assets, debts, income records, and supporting documents are collected so the working file rests on something concrete.
If the parties declare different assets, values, or classifications, the conflict stays visible until it is narrowed or escalated.
The platform can suggest a non-biased starting point based on the disclosed record and the likely legal baseline for the jurisdiction.
Structured to land around 5% to 10% of a lawyer-attended mediation path, not the full cost of adversarial divorce work.
Best for couples who want a calm, structured file with separate intake, shared financial inventory, document intake, and a neutral first-pass framework before lawyers or courts increase cost.
- separate intake for both spouses
- shared asset and debt worksheet
- neutral starting point for an amicable split
- AI-generated neutral summary and gap analysis included
The main launch tier. It keeps the file neutral, pushes the parties through reconciliation of disputed facts, and prepares organized case summaries for outside review without representing either spouse.
- full issue-mapping and reconciliation workflow
- review queue support when the file needs a checkpoint
- usable with or without separate lawyers
- AI summaries, information-gap analysis, and option framing included
For files with more financial categories, more supporting records, or more categories of disagreement that still belong in a neutral mediation workflow instead of immediate court escalation.
- expanded financial and evidence workload
- room for more narrative facts and supporting documents
- still far below a lawyer-heavy mediation track
- larger AI analysis budget for higher-document files
Reserve access now.
Couples can use Divide Amicably with or without separate lawyers. If lawyers are involved, they remain outside the platform as independent reviewers or advisors. The platform itself stays neutral, does not represent either side, and does not turn this into a legal proceeding by itself.
The recommendation engine is meant to look at the full record, not one spouse's story.
-
Declared assets and debts from both parties
The file combines both sides' inventories so one spouse cannot silently define the pool alone.
-
Existence, value, and classification of each item
The system records whether each item exists, what each side says it is worth, and whether it is claimed as marital, separate, mixed, or disputed.
-
Supporting documents and narrative context
Statements, uploaded records, and comments stay attached to the item so disagreements can be traced and reviewed.
-
Issue map beyond property alone
Parenting, support, housing, debt, and process concerns are also part of the mediation file when they affect the path to agreement.
-
Jurisdiction baseline
The platform is being built to compare the disclosed record against how the pilot jurisdiction would likely approach division, while keeping that model explicit and reviewable.
If the parties list different assets, the file is not treated as settled.
-
Unilateral items stay visible
If only one spouse lists an asset or debt, it remains in the record as unresolved instead of disappearing.
-
Disputed values stay disputed
If the parties disagree on valuation, the system records both positions and keeps the item out of the fully confirmed pool.
-
Completeness must be attested
Both spouses eventually need to attest that the disclosed list is complete before the platform treats the asset pool as ready for a neutral recommendation.
-
Recommendations are baseline scenarios
The system can suggest a fair starting point from the confirmed record, but unresolved conflicts still require more evidence, negotiation, or human review.
Non-biased mediation support, not legal representation.
-
No legal services
Divide Amicably is not a law firm and does not provide legal representation to either party.
-
No legal proceeding on this platform
Using this product does not start a court action, arbitration, or legally binding process by itself.
-
Neutral process design
The product is being built to organize facts, show disagreements clearly, and create a fairer negotiation starting point for amicable parties.
-
Escalation where needed
Unsafe, coercive, or unusually complex matters should move to human review instead of staying self-serve.
-
Independent review still matters
Any final agreement should be reviewed, formalized, and filed through the proper legal channels if the parties choose to make it binding.
The pilot already has a real backend spine.
-
Live persistence
Users, sessions, cases, invitations, issues, documents, review data, and billing records are stored in PostgreSQL on the production host.
-
Workflow already running
The API supports intake, financial inventory, financial disclosure attestation, issue mapping, document intake, and neutral distribution scenarios.
-
Pilot direction
The product is being shaped for a narrow, reviewer-aware pilot instead of a reckless mass-market legal automation launch.